Thursday, November 30, 2006

Update

Last monday was my last day at Starbucks, hopefully, after over six years of employment. I am currently looking for a new job. I have a few potential positions, and one set top begin on Jan 1st. Hopefully I can land something decent soon. Tuesday Lexy and I met up with Lee and had dinner with Jamie at Zen Palette, a fabulous chain of restraunts in NYC that serve vegetarian and vegan food. We than met up with Caitlin Rachel and Sam and saw Thursday, Circa, and Rise Against, which I may or may not describe at a later date. I'm tired. Substance .... I may regain my energy next week. This weekend I'll be at some more Arendt conferences, this time at New School, and then later at NYU.

Tuesday, November 14, 2006

Babel

Like the Fountain, Babel is a film that I can't yet write about, out of respect for the style of film, and not wanting to ruin it for those who have yet to see it. So this review will be of its strenghts and weaknesses, and generally critiquing it's style, not the specific plot points, etc.

Babel, the third collaboration between director Alejandro González Iñárritu and his writing partner, Guillermo Arriaga, is a stunningly beautiful, disjointed, emotional rollercoaster, ranging from charming, lovely scenes of familial bliss to down right sadistic personal tragedies. Babel follows four seperate groups, who each experience there own tragedy, connected to shooting of an American tourist in Morocco. Other reviewers have tried to make this event sound like the catalyst, but that's not quite true, as the web of interconnectedness has not origin, and that's the point. We focus on these four, but the story could easily go back further, and will continue. Such is life. The story is told in a non-linear fashion, and is so disjointed that the veiwer may not immediatly be able to pick up on the chronology of events, the interconnectedness of the four different stories, and may even forget that, for example, something is going on simulatneously in Mexico. When we one story we haven't heard from in a while pops up, we are thrust back into the Mexican Boarder, or the hills in Morocco, and the full emotional weight of what's happening is made more real. The transitions are not fluid, and this jarring effect works well in forcing the veiwer to emphathize with the characterts. In one scene, for example, in a Japanese club, the film switches back and forth between the perspective of Chieko, a deaf-mute Japanese girl who is the focus of one of the narratives, and the perspective of the narrator. In effect the blasting dance music becomes an unbearably silence, with a muffled bassline undectable. Uncomfortable and awkward though these transitions may be, we suddenly have more understanding with this troubled girl. Her deafness alone is only one facet of her character, and we quickly learn that her socialization problems are much more complex. Her deaf friends provide this contrast, as if Iñárritu is saying to us directly, she is troubled, look at her tragic life. Chieko's narrative has been criticized by other reviewers as being a tenuous connection, at best, to the other three, but they are looking to closely at the plot, and not grasping what Arriaga and Iñárritu are trying to accomplish. This isn't a thriller, or mystery, and the non-linear structure is necessary because we are following the trajectory of each tragedy, not the chronology of events or specific plot. This is a story about emotions, and about the mechanisms in our world which produce such tragic lives. The story ends with a beautiful shot of Chieko and her father on the balcony of their topfloor apartments, towering over the Tokyo skyline. Rodrigo cinemetagraphy is gorgeuous, as always, and worth the price of admission alone. He works amazingly well with Iñárritu, and scenes such as the afformentioned discotech scene, in which the strobe seems to reduce Chieko to a series of photographs, are executed perfectly.

When the fellow Western tourists on the bus refuse to wait for help to arrive, we may see them as terribly cold and uncaring, but we are, in my view, not meant to take them literally (as if no westerner would risk their lives to help an injured fellow traveler.) Instead they are an abstraction, representing prevailing sentiments of Orientalism in the wealthy western traveler. Morocco became too real once the comforts of home and tour group disapperared. Cait Blanchett's character seems to be in this mold, until she is shot, that is, forced to reimagine her life and worldview.

Chieko is the emotional center of this story, and her breakdown is it's climax. When we see a scuffle at the US Border crossing, or two poor Moroccan farm boys get wrapped up in an international incident after accidently shooting an American tourist on a far off bus, or the aftermath of the shooting as a couple seeking to fix their marriage after loosing a child to SIDS, we are not focusing on the specific tragedies necessarily, but instead on the mechanisms in the system of living in a globalized world, the relations of power which produce these missunderstandings. Chieko is central to this understanding of the film, as her inability to communicate is more apparent, and her failure to socialize makes this more tragic. Even the loss of her mother makes the parallels all the more powerful, as we learn in the end.

The actors range in how succesful their contributions to the film are, but this is to be expected in a film that is essentially four films wrapped into one, with three different production teams in Mexico, Morocco, and Japan. Standout performances by Said Tarchani, as young Moroccon sharpshooter Ahmed, and Adriana Barraza, as the nanny Amelia, are worth noting. Gael Garcia Bernal's role as Santiago was much shorter than I had anticipated, but well acted as well. Rinko Kikuchi, as Chieko, of course steals the show.

The score is performed Gustavo Santolallo, who does an excellent job of incorporating local flavor into his guitar playing in each scene. His one guitar manages to evoke Spanish style flamenco playing, Mexican folk, Arabic influence, and Japanese modes, subtely, uniting the pieces together in a common language.

The Biblical reference may be less central to the story than implied, for it focuses, as far as I can tell, on the misscommunications and obvious references to towers or biblical stories(Chieko's apartments, the hospital in Morroco, Amelia wandering in the dessert.) Perhaps this just showing us how stories of Biblical importance and moral lessons occur today, or perhaps it is a parable, warming us of the danger of striving too high. Man was punished for his great technology, attempting to build a tower to reach towards the heavens. It seems that we are being warned that with todays rapid technological growth and the era of globalization, we too are put in our place by mechanisms in the world. We are all connected, and the backlash from our hubris is inexcabale.

Tuesday, November 07, 2006

CMJ "Death is the road to awe."

So after Halloween, I had to get up nice and early to commute to the city for CMJ at Lincoln Center. My first day was spent working on th efourth floor checking Badges for panels. For those who don't know, CMJ stands for the College Music Journal, and has hosted a music marathon in NYC every fall for about the last 25 years. Bands play showcases all over town, and panels on the music industry are held at Lincoln Center. Students and industry types some from all over the country (and world) and with the CMJ Badge gain access to all panels and shows. In the pasts many bands have made big splashes, and been signed or made a big break. The Arcade Fire, Clap Your Hands, etc. This year, I think the Annuals may be the buzz band to break this year, but I didn't see them. But back to my story... The panels were fun. Martin, my co-volunteer, was a nice guy, and the work was pretty much a joke. The panels were very interesting and informative. I went to some shows, but many nights I was so tired from working all day and what not, that I couldn't even enjoy it. We saw Saxon Shore play one song. We arrived late, and they played a short set, but the little we saw was good. No keys tho, which was dissapointing. The panels on thursday were good, and that night after Saxon Shore I crashed at Hillary's dorm at Barnard so I wouldn;t be late to work on friday morning. I was at Lincoln Center at 8am, and spent over alot of time packing bags, then directing traffic outside, working the panel, and directing traffic again. I met a bunch of cool volunteers, though, and actually had a good time. Friday night I saw Erase Erata and Derrhoof, and then missed ROsetta, buit saw Dysrhythmia. t Jucifer cancelled, and I left before Mouth of the Architech went on. Saturday I did some shopping, and saw the Fall at Hiro Ballroom. After that, which was kinda dissapointing, I went on saw Grails and MGR at Sin-e. I didn't stay for Kayo Dot, cos I was too tired to sit through Made out of Babies. When did I get so lame?

Thursday was the highlight for me, as I got to see The Fountain, the fantastic new film by Darron Aronofsky, the director of Pi and Requiem for a Dream. I saw Pi years ago, when I heard good things and bought the DVD. Then Requiem came out, but I didn't see it until much later than most. I think the Fountain surpasses both of these. Pi was excellent, and explored interesting themes, but doesn't come close to the Fountain in terms of its scope, not to mention the visuals. Requiem may have been well done, but it jus't doesn't resonate in the same way. The Fountain is, in some ways, a look at timeless concerns of love, life, and death. I am particularly interested in the discussion of death, for it seems increasingly clear to me that our cultures fear of death is a defining aspect of our world view, and it's troubling. I don't want to give anything away, so I will only recommend that everyone go and see the Fountain. I can't wait to see it again. "When a sparrow ate the tree's fruit, his father flew with the birds. Death was his Father's road to awe." I've seen many people refer to this movie as sci-fi, but that really doesn't describe it. Although there is a sci-fi component, it is free of the trappings of the genre, and isn't really an important point in the story. The science and mysticism is obvious just a device to explore a man's coming to terms with death, or more importantlly the death of a loved one. The movie is gorgeuous, free of CGI, as Aronofsky searched to transcend sated looking techonology, and used a microphotographer, I believe, to generate images. And my favorite aspect is, I think, the score, once again composed by Clint Mansell, and performed by the Kronos Quartet, with help from one of my favorite bands, Scottish post-rockers Mogwai. The score stands on its own, but really captures the mood of the film.